French Webquest Research Project for French Class

Language classes are as fun or as boring as the teacher and students make them. Grammar drills, vocabulary tests, and pronunciation labs are the basis of many successful language classes, but its also good to incorporate some creative interaction, and projects can be just the thing.A webquest is an interesting project for French classes or for independent studiers looking to spice up their self-instruction. This project is perfect as a long-term activity for intermediate and advanced students, though it can also be adapted for beginners.ProjectResearch various topics related to French, to be shared as a paper, website, and/or oral presentationInstructions Decide whether students will work individually or in groupsReview my list of potential subjects, below, and decide whether students will choose their own topic(s) or be assignedExplain the purpose of a webquest: to gather information via the internet that will be shared in whatever format(s) the teacher chooses. If a website is desired, consider having students use the PowerPoint templates provided on Abouts Presentation Software site, which are accompanied by detailed, step-by-step instructionsExplain about plagiarism and the importance of citing sources. For example, students are welcome to link to any of the material on this or other websites, but should not copy text to their own sites or in their papers.Pass out a list of required/optional sections, the desired length, and any other guidelinesStudents do the webquest, then write up reports, create websites, and/or prepare oral presentationsAfter all presentations, students could write a summary or comparison of other presentatio ns TopicsTopic(s) can be assigned by the teacher or chosen by the students. Each student or group can do an in-depth study of one topic, such as the Acadà ©mie franà §aise, or a comparison of two or more topics, such as the difference between the Acadà ©mie franà §aise and the Alliance franà §aise. Or they might choose several topics and just answer a few questions about each of them. Here are some possible topics, with a few basic questions to consider - the teacher and/or students should use this just as a starting point. Acadà ©mie franà §aise: What is this organization? When was it created? Has its purpose changed over time?Alliance franà §aise: What is this organization? When was it created? Has its purpose changed over time?Celebrations and Holidays: What are some important holidays in France and other French-speaking countries? How do they compare to your countrys holidays?Differences between French and English: What are some key differences?Fluency: What is fluency? Why is it hard to define?French in English: How has French influenced English?French-Speaking Celebrities: Choose several celebrities and explain why they speak FrenchFrench Gestures: Are any similar to those in your country? Are any the same gesture with a different meaning?Introduction to French: How did French evolve? What languages is it related to?Jobs Using French: What kind of work is speaking French useful for?Living Working in France: How can a person live and work in France?Moroccan Culture: What are some interesting as pects of Moroccan culture? Is there anything shocking?La Nà ©gritude: What is Nà ©gritude? How and where did it evolve? Who were the trois pà ¨res? Who were some other key participants?Register: What are the various French registers? Provide examples of words in each oneThe Rude French: Are the French rude? Why or why not? Where does this stereotype come from?Spanish vs French: How are they similar/different? Is one easier than the other?Translation and Interpretation : What is the difference? How are they similar?Verlan: What is it?What is French? Facts and Figures: Where is French spoken? By how many people?What Is the Best Way to Learn French?: Compare and contrast the various methodsWhy learn French: How can it help you? Notes The collective webquests will offer an extensive collection of material about French, which can be shared with other teachers, parents, and potential students.

The Issue Of Political Values - 1712 Words

Political values are the common views that Texans and Americans hold regarding government, politics, and economics. The common political values that are shared are liberty, equality, consent of the governed, and capitalism. The first of the four values is liberty. Liberty is the principle that individuals are free to act as they wish as long as they don’t restrict or limit freedoms guaranteed to others. This principle is guaranteed by the constitution, which protects freedom of speech and expression, freedom to practice religion of choice, unreasonable search and seizure, etc. Second is Equality. Equality is the concept that barriers of discrimination against race, gender, and religion are removed, and help put people on a even†¦show more content†¦This economy enforces the American dream that through hard work and dedication anyone can be successful. These four political values unite us together. Generally all Americans believe in of these values no matter what party. However, how each political value is enforced varies different from person to person. Most Americans create a political ideology based on how they wish to enforce these political values. Political ideology are a consistent set of attitudes and beliefs concerning politics, the economy and the role of the government (Greenberg, pg.145). Political ideology divides people along the political continuum between conservatives and liberals, with liberals being on the far left and conservatives on the far right. Also it places people in a political quadrant. Each section of the political quadrant focuses on different views on ideas and issues. Each ideology has its own view about how much the government should do and what goals are legitimate for the government. The four political ideologies are: Liberals, Conservatives, libertarians, and populists. Liberals favor more government intervention to promote economic, social and political equality. They leave an individual free to make moral or personal decisions. They believe society should be equal, people are naturally good, and hold a positive view of human nature.

One Nation Indivisible free essay sample

This, though, was not an easy task. The memory of massive death was still in the front of everyones mind, hardening into resentment and sometimes even hatred. The south was non-existent politically or economically, and searching desperately for a way back in. Along with these things, now living amongst the population were almost four million former slaves, who had no idea how to make a living on their own. They had been freed by the 13th amendment, and in the future it became a great concern to many political leaders. Still, it was no secret that something had to be done. So, as usually happens, political leaders appeared on the stage, each lading their own plan of Reconstruction, each certain their ideas were the correct ones. One of the first people who came up with a blueprint for Reconstruction was the president at the time, Abraham Lincoln. The Lincoln Plan was a very open one, stating that after certain criteria were met a confederate state could return to the union. To rejoin, a state had to have ten percent of voters both accept the emancipation of slaves and swear loyalty to the union.Also, those high ranking officers of the state could not hold office or carry out voting rights unless the president said so. Well, sadly enough, Honest Abe was assassinated before he could put his plan to the test. After his death, several other political leaders emerged with plans in hand. These men were of the Republican Party, and they called themselves Radicals. The Radical Republicans that came out to play after Lincoln death had two main objectives to their cause. First, they were mad at the south, blaming them for the Civil War that had just ended. They wanted to punish them and make them pay.Secondly, they wanted to help all of the near four million slaves who were now free men after the war. They felt these men needed retention, and it was their job to do so. There were three main Radical Republican leaders. These men were Thatched Stevens, Charles Sumner, and the formally inaugurated president Andrew Johnson. Thatched Stevens was a very political man, holding a place in the House of Representatives. His main concern was the economic opportunity for slaves. He wanted them to be able to make a living on their own, and not depend on the white man as they had done all their lives.Thinking almost on these same lines was Charles Sumner. He was a senator who fought mainly for political rights for African Americans, s well as for their citizenship. He felt that the all men are created equal part of the constitution really should hold up for everybody. Well, for men that is. Finally there was President Andrew Johnson. Probably due to the fact that he had been Lincoln vice president, Johnson had in mind a Reconstruction plan that almost mirrored the former presidents. Many of the Radicals did not approve of Johnnys plan.They felt he went over the limit with 13,000 pardons, and that he wasnt paying enough attention to the major issue, the rights of slaves. In 1 868 Andrew Johnson was impeached. All though he was to removed from office at this time, he was basically without authority. It was at this point that Congress really stepped in with their own plan of Reconstruction. The Reconstruction Act finally passed by congress had two main points to it. First, troops were required to move in and take up residence in the confederate states of the south.Secondly, any state that wanted back into the union was only allowed to do so when and if they changed their 14th amendment. They had to agree that all men born in the U. S. Were citizens, and that because of that they were guaranteed equal treatment by the law. Later, in 1870, black men were also granted the vote But this WOUld come later. Now, the Reconstruction Act looked really good on paper, but as usually happens in politics somebody decided to be clever. This took place in the 1 876 presidential election.The two men running were Democrat Samuel Titled, and Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. Due to the closeness of the race, a group of men called a commission was set up in order to figure out an outcome. In the end, the result was the Compromise of 1877. In this compromise, Hayes was declared the winner, and this was agreed on by both parties. The problem though was that the military occupation of the southern states was put to an end. Without military force to back them up, the freed slaves living down there were without safety.There was nothing to keep the southerners from taking advantage of the freed men, and this is exactly what they did. Knowing that they couldnt directly disobey the law, many southerners set up their own laws, or black codes, that put hard restrictions on African Americans. At this point Reconstruction ended. The laws were in place, and though they didnt always work, some people felt that was enough, they had done their jobs. Its hard to say for sure whether or not Reconstruction was a success or a failure.Since the time it began people have been debating that question. Personally, I believe that though it wasnt a total success, it was at least a step in the right direction. Granted, laws that were set up werent followed strictly. Still, at least laws were being created to protect African American rights. I mean, they were now formally known as citizens, and were given the right to vote. Though not a huge leap, it was a major step. So, was Reconstruction a success? Yes. It was a success with exceptions.

The food movement in America

Introduction America’s food distribution system is heavily reliant on fast food restaurant chains, such as McDonalds. While such organizations are a mainstay of the country’s food distribution system, they also threaten the existence of independent, family-owned businesses, employment and even homogenize the country’s culture.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The food movement in America specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Analysis The fast food industry had modest beginnings in the South; these business entities existed as drive-throughs and restaurants. However, it is almost impossible to overlook a fast food restaurant in any major public institution around the country. Airports, elementary schools, airplanes, hospitals and even stadia have at least one restaurant franchise. As a consequence, Americans spend more money on fast food than they do on several other consumer items like books or car s. 75% of the nation consumes fast food from these franchises (Schlosser 55). Such choices have consequences on the existence and survival of other businesses in the food distribution system. When America’s food is sold by mega corporations, there are implications on the country’s wages, supply systems as well as competition in the sector. Unraveling these effects will determine the true costs of the franchises. This topic was highly interesting to me as well as to members of my community because a food giant like McDonald’s has adverse implications on the community’s economy. Purchasing decisions made by the organizations determine a community’s food industry viability. Furthermore, since several individuals personally identify with fast food restaurant brands, it is essential to understand how consumers contribute to challenges in self-employment and employment as well. Every time a person becomes loyal to a restaurant chain, he or she is propaga ting one of the worst effects of capitalism. The McDonalds of this country epitomize dominance by the have-nots as their wage bills are the worst. Not only do workers earn minimum wage, they also lack assurances from their employers concerning job security. This explains why they keep moving from one fast food job to another.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More When one analyses almost all franchise systems, one immediately notices that these restaurants strive to maintain one quality of production, and that is uniformity. Customers know that regardless of where they purchase their item, a pizza from Domino’s will almost always cost and taste the same. Food franchises around the country regard uniformity as their unique selling point. In fact, one of McDonald’s founders stated that the corporation is quick to eliminate non conformists. They threaten the survival of the institution and must be streamlined as quickly as possible. Homogenization is evident in marketing, production and innovation in this industry. Indeed, it is the success of firms that pursue homogenization in food distribution that caused several businesses to adopt the same notion. This pattern eventually prioritizes efficiency over other human values. It gives one a glimpse of what the country stands to loose if it keeps pursuing this brand of capitalism. In order to understand what the industry really means to Americans, one should start with the history of the food franchise system. Initially, in the first half of the twentieth century, people purchased their hot dogs and hamburgers from drive-ins. However, one organization threatened the very existence of these enterprises, and it was known as McDonalds. Richard and Mac had been in the drive-in food business for a while, but were dissatisfied by its returns. They spent most of their time looking for specialized cooks becau se the ones they hired often left their positions for more lucrative job opportunities. These two brothers also realized that they were spending a lot of money in the replacement of dishes as their younger clients would often mishandle them. In 1948, the entrepreneurs decided that they would change the items they sold, the dishware they used and even the process of production. First, they purchased a large grill, in which they would make more burgers within a short period of time. They also replaced their fragile dishes with disposables and plastics. The businessmen hired different workers for different aspects of the hamburger preparation process. This division of labor would ascertain that even amateurs could learn the skill quickly and work for the organization as soon as they got in. It was no longer necessary to hire specialized cooks who were difficult to find and expensive to keep. The company then selected the only ingredients that would be placed in the burger. Any person w ho attempted to change these ingredients would immediately loose their job.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The food movement in America specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This food assembly line made McDonalds’ and several other franchises one of the most efficient businesses in the country. Drive–ins had to close because they could not deliver food at the same prices as the franchises. With time, these chains spread countrywide (Pollan 100). The production process at several restaurant chains discourages workers to innovate; however, one should not assume that these organizations do not carry out research and development. In fact, a large majority of these institutions engage in extensive use of technology. The only difference between them and specialized restaurants is that they leave that work to higher-level managers. Typical Pizza Hut employees do not know what it takes to change a system. They merely play their part and wait for their paycheck. The individual has thus been trivialized and made to appear insignificant in this system. Employees cannot ask for much because they are easily replaceable. It is no wonder many of them cannot access work benefits or even permanent employment. Doing so would mean transferring power and control away from the large corporation into small hands. Management determines the quality, techniques and speed at which products are produced. Therefore, the skills and talents of workers are devalued. This explains why turnover rates are alarming within the industry. In one year, a restaurant chain can fire a worker once every three months. Even the firms’ attitude towards unionization of workers illustrates this aspect. Employees do not qualify for overtime regardless of how much time they put into their businesses (Weber 120). One would argue that these restaurant chains have created entrepreneurial opportunities for several franchise o wners. However, such managers have no freedom to change production. Those who choose to do so can easily loose their licenses. Their job is simply to continue what senior managers have started. Any franchisee who threatens the uniformity of the institution will harm the company’s ability to stay efficient, and this means that they have to be dispensed.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Independent businesses within the entire food supply chain have also been adversely affected by this business model. Every year, the firm opens approximately two thousand new chains, and these consume a lot of products. It is a given fact that McDonalds’ buys the largest chunk of potatoes in the nation; the same is true for meat. Therefore, meat and potato producers have to make contractual agreements with the institution. When a buyer has so much buying power, then he can control the way products are consumed as well as their prices. It is not surprising that the company selects processed foods for sale. Several consumers have no say in the safety and health choices of their foods because mega corporations like McDonalds’ make those choices for them. It should also be noted that this food purchaser is so influential that it led to the creation of a new breed of chicken, which would be part of the McNuggets combination. It comes as no surprise that large fast food rest aurant chains would liaise with other large-scale food suppliers to access their raw materials more efficiently. As a consequence, the small-scale farmer looses out because he has no chance of winning contracts from such a big buyer. These independent farmers are not as reliable as the large-scale ones. Similarly, independent restaurant owners also have challenges competing with fast food franchises. They still struggle with some of the problems that McDonalds’ had at its inception. Many consumers stick to brands they know even though the quality of the food is questionable. Therefore, the average American will select a food franchise over a relatively unknown family restaurant. This means that they will not purchase food that is ethically-raised or healthily-grown as fast food franchises do not prioritize these issues. McDonald’s and other restaurant chains will continue to be more successful since smaller entrepreneurs keep being chocked out. This widens the gap betw een the rich and the poor, and hampers economic growth among the masses (Schlosser 156). Conclusion Fast food restaurant franchises have chocked competition in the food distribution system as they control food suppliers and food prices. Small independent restaurants cannot stay in business as consumers stick to familiar fast-food brands. Furthermore, they devalue employees as these individuals lack skills and can be easily dispensed. Works Cited Pollan, Michael. Omnivore’s dilemma. NY: Penguin Publishers, 2009. Print. Schlosser, Eric. Fast food nation: The dark side of the all-American meal. NY: Mariner Books, 2003. Print. Weber, Karl. Food inc.: A participant’s guide: How industrial food is making us sicker, fatter, and poorer-And what you can do about it. Chicago: Public Affairs, 2009. Print. This essay on The food movement in America was written and submitted by user Michaela Reeves to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.